Introduction:
The Negotiable Instruments Act, enacted in 1881, serves as the legal framework governing negotiable instruments such as promissory notes. Bills of exchange, and cheques in India. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act holds significant importance as it deals with the dishonor of cheques and outlines the legal consequences for individuals involved in such cases. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of Section 138, examining its provisions, procedures. And the implications it has on both the drawer and the payee.
Background of Section 138:
The dishonor of cheques has been a long-standing issue in the realm of commercial transactions. To address this concern, Section 138 was introduced as an amendment to the Negotiable Instruments Act in 1988. The primary objective was to instill confidence in the credibility of negotiable instruments and deter individuals from issuing cheques without adequate funds or with the intent to defraud.
Key Provisions of Section 138:
- Essential Elements for Offense: Section 138 specifies certain essential elements that must be satisfied for an offense to be established. These include the issuance of a cheque for the discharge of a debt or other liability, the cheque being returned unpaid, and the drawer failing to make payment within 15 days of receiving notice of dishonor.
- Presumption of Offense: A notable feature of Section 138 is the presumption of an offense. Once the payee has provided a notice of dishonor to the drawer, the drawer is presumed to have committed the offense unless proven otherwise. This places the burden of proof on the drawer to establish their innocence.
- Time Limit for Notice: To initiate legal proceedings under Section 138, the payee must issue a notice within 30 days of the dishonor of the cheque. The notice must demand payment of the cheque amount, and the drawer has 15 days from the receipt of the notice to make the payment.
- Criminal Liability: Section 138 imposes criminal liability on the drawer of the dishonored cheque. Upon conviction, the defaulter may face imprisonment for a term that may extend to two years or with a fine that may extend to twice the amount of the cheque or with both.
- Compounding of Offense: One distinctive feature of Section 138 is the provision for compounding the offense. With the consent of the payee and the court, the drawer can settle the matter by paying the cheque amount along with any additional compensation agreed upon.
Legal Procedures Under Section 138:
- Issuing a Notice: The process commences with the payee issuing a notice to the drawer within 30 days of the dishonor of the cheque. The notice must demand payment of the cheque amount and must be sent via registered post or speed post. Providing proof of delivery.
- Response to Notice: Upon receiving the notice, the drawer has 15 days to make the payment. If the payment is made within this period, the matter is considered resolved. However, if the drawer fails to make the payment within the stipulated time, the payee can proceed with filing a complaint.
- Filing a Complaint: To initiate legal proceedings, the payee must file a complaint within one month from the expiry of the 15-day period given to the drawer. The complaint is filed before the Magistrate having jurisdiction over the matter.
- Magistrate’s Role: The Magistrate conducts an inquiry and may issue summons to the parties involved. If the drawer fails to appear despite receiving summons, the Magistrate may issue a warrant for their arrest.
- Evidence and Trial: During the trial, both parties present their evidence. The complainant must establish the essential elements of the offense, and the burden of proof then shifts to the drawer to prove their innocence.
- Conviction and Sentencing: If the Magistrate is satisfied that the offense has been committed, they may convict the drawer. The drawer may face imprisonment, a fine, or both, as prescribed under Section 138.
Implications and Challenges:
- Deterrent Effect: Section 138 has had a significant deterrent effect on the issuance of dishonored cheques. Knowing the legal consequences, individuals are more cautious in their financial transactions, thereby promoting trust and reliability in commercial dealings.
- Legal Complexity: While Section 138 aims to address the issue of dishonored cheques, the legal procedures involved can be complex. The strict timelines, legal technicalities, and the burden of proof make it crucial for parties involved to seek legal counsel.
- Scope for Misuse: Individuals may use Section 138 as a tool for harassment, as critics argue. They may use frivolous complaints or the threat of legal action to coerce individuals into settling disputes. Even when the dishonor of the cheque is unintentional.
- Complications in Recovery: Despite legal provisions, the recovery of the cheque amount may pose challenges. If the drawer lacks the financial means to make the payment. The legal victory for the payee may not translate into practical financial gain.
Conclusion:
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act plays a crucial role in upholding the sanctity of negotiable instruments and promoting trust in commercial transactions. By imposing criminal liability for the dishonor of cheques. The provision acts as a deterrent, discouraging individuals from engaging in fraudulent or negligent financial practices. However, the legal procedures involved demand a thorough understanding of the law, and individuals must exercise caution to prevent the unintended consequences of legal action. As the landscape of financial transactions evolves, it becomes imperative to revisit and, if necessary. Amend legal frameworks to ensure their continued relevance and effectiveness.
Also Read… Section 8 Company Registration under the Companies Act 2013
